Queen’s University Professor John Harrison Disputes Health Canada’s Wind Turbine Noise Study
Credit: By Elliot Ferguson, Kingston Whig-Standard | Wednesday, November 12, 2014 | www.thewhig.com ~~
One of the key experts backing opposition to a wind energy development on Amherst Island said a recent Health Canada study is more politics than science.
John Harrison, a Queen’s University professor emeritus in physics and a member of the Association to Protect Amherst Island, said the report contradicts itself and was not peer reviewed.
In a report released last week, Health Canada said there is no link between noise from wind turbines and adverse health effects.
Health Canada scientists looked at communities that host wind farms. Two dozen government, academic and industry experts contributed to the study.
Researchers examined 1,200 participants living within 2 km of wind turbines in Ontario and P.E.I.
Scientists found that while some residents living near wind turbines noted some indicators of stress – sleep disruption, headaches – there was nothing to indicate those stressors were the result of the wind turbines.
“It’s the conclusion the Ontario government wants to hear. It’s the conclusion that the wind industry wants to hear,” Harrison said Wednesday.
Harrison pointed out that the report later states that annoyance caused by the noise from wind turbines is linked to sleep problems, illness, stress and quality of life.
“I can’t help, as a scientist, to link those together and say annoyance increases with the noise, health effects increase with the annoyance, so health effects must increase with the noise.”
Harrison also criticized the report, which is a summary of conclusions reached by a larger study, for not including the scientific data the study collected.
Harrison said he originally supported Health Canada’s plan to survey the effect wind turbines have on people living nearby.
But with the release of last week’s report, something Harrison called “premature,” the lack of scientific data makes it impossible to have it reviewed by other scientists, he said.
[rest of article available at source]